Treatment of Upper Airway Obstruction in Infants with Micrognathia Using Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

ABSTRACT

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis has become an accepted alternative treatment for infants and children with upper airway obstruction associated with micrognathia. Several reports exist that purport the efficacy of mandibular distraction in these patients, such as preventing tracheostomy or facilitating tracheostomy removal. However, the majority of these studies are retrospective reviews with small cohorts and relatively short-term follow-up. Consequently, the ideal indications, pre- and postoperative evaluation, timing, and treatment are subject to controversy and not currently well established. Significantly less attention has been given to short- and long-term complications of mandibular distraction, such as effects on the developing tooth buds, impact on future mandibular development, and temporomandibular joint abnormalities. This article reviews the basic principles of distraction osteogenesis, summarizes the outcomes of recent literature involving pediatric mandibular distraction including this author's experience, and discusses the known and potential adverse sequelae of mandibular distraction. Before a clearly defined role of mandibular distraction in the treatment of infants with micrognathia-associated upper airway obstruction can be established, additional prospective studies are necessary to delineate its benefits and limitations.

Distraction osteogenesis - micrognathia - Pierre Robin sequence - upper airway obstruction - mandible - infant

REFERENCES

• 1 McCarthy J G, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne C H, Grayson B H. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  89 1-10
• 2 Zeitouni A, Manoukian J. Tracheotomy in the first year of life.  J Otolaryngol. 1993;  22 431-434
• 3 Tomaski S M, Zalzal G H, Saal H M. Airway obstruction in the Pierre Robin sequence.  Laryngoscope. 1995;  105 111-114
• 4 Singer L T, Kercsmar C, Legris G et al.. Developmental sequelae of long-term infant tracheostomy.  Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989;  31 224-230
• 5 Wetmore R F, Handler S D, Potsic W P. Pediatric tracheostomy: experience during the past decade.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1982;  91 628-632
• 6 Conway W A, Victor L D, Magilligan D J et al.. Adverse effects of tracheostomy for sleep apnea.  JAMA. 1981;  246 347-350
• 7 Lin S Y, Halbower A C, Tunkel D E, Vanderkolk C. Relief of upper airway obstruction with mandibular distraction surgery: long-term results in young children.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;  132 437-441
• 8 Steinbacher D M, Kaban L B, Troulis M J. Mandibular advancement by distraction osteogenesis for tracheostomy-dependent children with severe micrognathia.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;  63 1072-1079
• 9 Denny A, Amm C. New technique for airway correction in neonates with severe Pierre Robin sequence.  J Pediatr. 2005;  147 97-101
• 10 Izadi K, Yellon R, Mandell D L et al.. Correction of upper airway obstruction in the newborn with internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis.  J Craniofac Surg. 2003;  14 493-499
• 11 Wang X, Wang X X, Cheng L et al.. Distraction osteogenesis in correction of micrognathia accompanying obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112 1549-1557
• 12 Sorin A, McCarthy J G, Bernstein J M. Predicting decannulation outcomes after distraction osteogenesis for syndromic micrognathia.  Laryngoscope. 2004;  114 1815-1821
• 13 Denny A, Kalantarian B. Mandibular distraction in neonates: a strategy to avoid tracheostomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 896-904
• 14 Perlyn C A, Schmelzer R E, Sutera S P et al.. Effect of distraction osteogenesis of the mandible on upper airway volume and resistance in children with micrognathia.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 1809-1818
• 15 Sidman J D, Sampson D, Templeton B. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children.  Laryngoscope. 2001;  111 1137-1146
• 16 Denny A D, Talisman R, Hanson P R, Recinos R F. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in very young patients to correct airway obstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108 302-311
• 17 Morovic C G, Monasterio L. Distraction osteogenesis for obstructive apneas in patients with congenital craniofacial malformations.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 2324-2330
• 18 Williams J K, Maull D, Grayson B H, Longaker M T, McCarthy J G. Early decannulation with bilateral mandibular distraction for tracheostomy-dependent patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  103 48-57
• 19 Cohen S R, Simms C, Burstein F D. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of upper airway obstruction in children with craniofacial deformities.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 312-318
• 20 Ilizarov G A. Basic principles of transosseus compression and distraction osteosynthesis.  Ortop Travmatol Protez. 1971;  32 7-9
• 21 Komoro Y, Akizuki T, Kurakata M, Ohmori K. Histological examination of regenerated bone through craniofacial bone distraction in clinical studies.  J Craniofac Surg. 1999;  10 467-471
• 22 Mofid M M, Manson P N, Robertson B C et al.. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of 3278 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108 1103-1114
• 23 McCarthy J G, Katzen J T, Hopper R A et al.. The first decade of mandibular distraction: lessons we have learned.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 1704-1713
• 24 Carls F R, Sailer H F. Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;  26 197-208
• 25 van Strijen P J, Breuning K H, Becking A G et al.. Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices.  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;  96 392-397
• 26 Hurmerinta K, Peltomaki T, Hukki J. Unexpected events during mandibular distraction osteogenesis.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;  38 209-214
• 27 Spring M A, Mount D L. Peidatric feeding disorder and growth decline following mandibular distraction osteogenesis.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  118 476-482
• 28 Hollier L H, Kim J H, Grayson B et al.. Mandibular growth after distraction in patients under 48 months of age.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  103 1361-1370
• 29 Thurmuller P, Troulis M J, Rosenberg A, Chuang S, Kaban L B. Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;  64 249-258
• 30 Thurmuller P, Troulis M J, Rosenberg A, Kaban L B. Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;  60 1327-1333
• 31 Kruse-Losler B, Meyer U, Floren C, Joos U. Influence of distraction rates on the temporomandibular joint position and cartilage morphology in a rabbit model of mandibular lengthening.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;  59 1452-1461
• 32 McCormick S U, McCarthy J G, Grayson B H, Staffenberg D, McCormick S A. Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint: Part 1, canine study.  J Craniofac Surg. 1995;  6 358-363
• 33 Zou S, Hu J, Wang D, Li J, Tang Z. Changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction.  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001;  16 221-225
• 34 Azumi Y, Sugawara J, Takahashi I et al.. Positional and morphologic changes of the mandibular condyles after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in skeletal class II patients.  World J Orthod. 2004;  5 32-39
• 35 McCormick S U, McCarthy J G, Grayson B H, Staffenberg D. Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint: Part 2, Clinical study.  J Craniofac Surg. 1995;  6 364-367